<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Liffey Insights</title>
    <link>https://liffey.ai/insights</link>
    <atom:link href="https://liffey.ai/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Brendan Hughes on commercial strategy, AI and where value leaks in a business.</description>
    <language>en-ie</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>The Commercial Problem Beneath Confident Garbage</title>
      <link>https://liffey.ai/insights/the-commercial-problem-beneath-confident-garbage</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://liffey.ai/insights/the-commercial-problem-beneath-confident-garbage</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>brendan@liffey.ai (Brendan Hughes)</author>
      <description>AI is helping everyone go faster. We've been working with our own AI engine on 33 leaks that were costing us trust, credibility and people's willingness to engage with us.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI made us all better writers. It is making us all the same writer.</title>
      <link>https://liffey.ai/insights/ai-made-us-all-better-writers</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://liffey.ai/insights/ai-made-us-all-better-writers</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>brendan@liffey.ai (Brendan Hughes)</author>
      <description>LinkedIn has shipped a button for reporting AI slop, and it is the right call. It is also aimed at the cheap half of the problem. The expensive half is what ungrounded AI is doing to your voice, and to the decisions nobody ever publishes.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Your customers are about to ask you to prove it.</title>
      <link>https://liffey.ai/insights/your-customers-are-about-to-ask-you-to-prove-it</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://liffey.ai/insights/your-customers-are-about-to-ask-you-to-prove-it</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>brendan@liffey.ai (Brendan Hughes)</author>
      <description>Software spend is being audited the way headcount always was. The companies that hold price will be the ones that can say what changes because they exist, and show the number. The same pressure is arriving on the vendor side as a reckoning over AI returns.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI ROI is forcing a commercial reckoning</title>
      <link>https://liffey.ai/insights/ai-roi-is-forcing-a-commercial-reckoning</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://liffey.ai/insights/ai-roi-is-forcing-a-commercial-reckoning</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>brendan@liffey.ai (Brendan Hughes)</author>
      <description>The boardroom question about AI has changed. It used to be where can we apply it. Now it is where is the return, and who is accountable for it. That second question is a commercial one, and it is the one most operating models cannot answer.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI deals stall because nobody owns the outcome</title>
      <link>https://liffey.ai/insights/nobody-owns-the-outcome</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://liffey.ai/insights/nobody-owns-the-outcome</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>brendan@liffey.ai (Brendan Hughes)</author>
      <description>AI deals rarely stall because the technology fell short. They stall because the commercial exchange is unclear. The moment the system does the work, the buyer stops purchasing a tool and starts purchasing a result.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The GenAI divide is an operating-model problem</title>
      <link>https://liffey.ai/insights/the-genai-divide</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://liffey.ai/insights/the-genai-divide</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>brendan@liffey.ai (Brendan Hughes)</author>
      <description>Enterprise AI adoption is high and enterprise AI return is not. The research puts the gap somewhere close to universal, and the dividing line has almost nothing to do with the models.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Your team is using AI. The business isn’t.</title>
      <link>https://liffey.ai/insights/your-team-is-using-ai-the-business-isnt</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://liffey.ai/insights/your-team-is-using-ai-the-business-isnt</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>brendan@liffey.ai (Brendan Hughes)</author>
      <description>Access to AI stopped being an advantage the moment everybody had it. What separates the companies seeing a return is where they put it: into commercial decisions, or into individual tabs.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
